<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Paris Geospatial, LLC - Expert Geospatial Consulting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paris-geospatial.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paris-geospatial.com</link>
	<description>Tel: (559) 294-1662  E-mail: jparis@paris-geospatial.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:42:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What is Remote Sensing?</title>
		<link>http://paris-geospatial.com/what-is-remote-sensing/</link>
		<comments>http://paris-geospatial.com/what-is-remote-sensing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paris-geospatial.com/what-is-remote-sensing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lillesand et al. (2004) define remote sensing as “the science and art of
obtaining information about an object … through the analysis of data acquired
by a device that is not in contact with the object.” This includes sensors that
measure gravitational, magnetic, or electric forces; sonic devices; and optical
and microwave imagers that sense electromagnetic radiation (EMR). Scripts
by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lillesand et al. (2004) define remote sensing as “the science and art of<br />
obtaining information about an object … through the analysis of data acquired<br />
by a device that is not in contact with the object.” This includes sensors that<br />
measure gravitational, magnetic, or electric forces; sonic devices; and optical<br />
and microwave imagers that sense electromagnetic radiation (EMR). Scripts<br />
by Jack™ deal mostly with remotely-sensed EMR data from a variety of<br />
multispectral (MS) systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paris-geospatial.com/what-is-remote-sensing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are the Types of EMR Systems?</title>
		<link>http://paris-geospatial.com/what-are-the-types-of-emr-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://paris-geospatial.com/what-are-the-types-of-emr-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 22:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paris-geospatial.com/what-are-the-types-of-emr-systems/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[• Active EMR Systems:

 Radar (RAdio Detection And Ranging): Synthetic Aperture Radar(SAR) and InterFerometric SAR (IFSAR)
 LIDAR (LIght Detection And Ranging)

• Passive EMR Systems:
o Non-imaging radiometers (a.k.a., spectrometers)
o Optical EMR imagers (some are imaging radiometers):

 Single-band imagers, e.g., panchromatic (PAN)
 Shortwave multispectral (MS) imagers: e.g., blue-light (BL), greenlight(GL), red-light (RL), near infrared (N), and middle [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>• <strong>Active EMR Systems:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> Radar (RAdio Detection And Ranging): Synthetic Aperture Radar(SAR) and InterFerometric SAR (IFSAR)</li>
<li> LIDAR (LIght Detection And Ranging)</li>
</ul>
<p>•<strong> Passive EMR Systems:</strong><br />
o Non-imaging radiometers (a.k.a., spectrometers)<br />
o Optical EMR imagers (some are imaging radiometers):</p>
<ul>
<li> Single-band imagers, e.g., panchromatic (PAN)</li>
<li> Shortwave multispectral (MS) imagers: e.g., blue-light (BL), greenlight(GL), red-light (RL), near infrared (N), and middle infrared (M)systems.</li>
<li> Thermal infrared imagers</li>
<li> Hyperspectral imagers</li>
</ul>
<p>Some Passive EMR Systems cover the whole earth more than once every<br />
day, but at very coarse spatial resolution (250-m or worse). Other Passive<br />
EMR Systems capture very high-resolution images (as good as 0.61-m) – but<br />
not every day or even every month or year. Active EMR Systems on<br />
spacecraft today include only single-band, single polarization combinations of<br />
SAR systems.<br />
Organized by spatial resolution, Four Basic Types of Passive EMR Systems<br />
include:<br />
• High Resolution: e.g., QuickBird, IKONOS &amp; OrbView 3<br />
• Medium Resolution: e.g., SPOT MS &amp; IRS (Indian Remote Sensing<br />
Satellite)<br />
• Low Resolution: e.g., Landsat (MSS, TM, ETM+) &amp; Terra ASTER<br />
• Coarse Resolution: e.g., Terra &amp; Aqua MODIS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paris-geospatial.com/what-are-the-types-of-emr-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a Good Image Good Enough?</title>
		<link>http://paris-geospatial.com/is-a-good-image-good-enough/</link>
		<comments>http://paris-geospatial.com/is-a-good-image-good-enough/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paris-geospatial.com/is-a-good-image-good-enough/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even the best looking natural color or color infrared images do not show the
full extent of the information that can be extracted from a MS image data set.
Making a “good-looking” image does not require highly-analytical operations.
But, producing accurate and consistent information always requires highly analytical
and precise, knowledge-based operations.
Many analysts rely exclusively on their brain and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even the best looking natural color or color infrared images do not show the<br />
full extent of the information that can be extracted from a MS image data set.<br />
Making a “good-looking” image does not require highly-analytical operations.<br />
But, producing accurate and consistent information <em>always requires highly analytical<br />
and precise, knowledge-based operations</em>.<br />
Many analysts rely exclusively on their brain and their eyes to “see”<br />
information in spatial patterns and perceived colors. While manual photo<br />
interpretation is an old and respectable art, this approach often leaves<br />
significant information behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paris-geospatial.com/is-a-good-image-good-enough/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
